Continuing the discussion from Pioreactor 40ml released!:
Hi @sharknaro, I have moved this topic into a new thread to avoid hijacking things too much.
I did play around with the PID parameters, and it certainly helped move the heating output to 100% more quickly, but the issue was more about the total time between a temperature perturbation and the return of the temperature to the target (within a tolerance). I think the most standard term is settling time. This delay is a function of both the aggressiveness of the temperature control loop and the physical properties of the system, like the power the heater can dump into the vial at 100% output and the size of the perturbation.
I’m not entirely sure what to expect from the pioreactor on this front, so I’ve probably missed some documentation on the topic.
For instance, here, it takes almost an hour to move from ~28C to the target of 37C. Perhaps I messed up the installation of the heater or perhaps this is somewhat expected performance.
To more closely match our scale-up targets, I have also been attempting the aerate the pioreactor at around 10-30 vessel volumes per minute, and if this air is dry and at ambient temperatures, the heating output to maintain the target temperature can be close to 90-95% (and it is sometimes impossible). Under these circumstances, the addition of some cold reagent can lead to a long perturbation away from the target temperature.
To be clear, I don’t know if what I’m describing is normal, but at the time that I was chasing down the issue, I figured I was just asking a bit much from the system.
I made some prototype systems to preheat and humidify the input air, and that seemed to help a good deal, if anyone is in a similar situation, but if anyone has any advice, I’d really appreciate it.
